Image de couverture de livre

Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of organic, inorganic and mixture of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and nutritive value in King Napier grass. The King Napier grass were assigned to seven treatments; Treatment 1, control (no fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 2 (50 N Kg/h...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: C. O., Nur Syafiqah, Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Noor Hisham, Jusoh, Shokri
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Langue:English
Publié: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2016
Accès en ligne:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77584/1/i-SIMBIOMAS%202016%2099.pdf
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
id oai:psasir.upm.edu.my:77584
record_format eprints
spelling oai:psasir.upm.edu.my:77584 http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77584/ Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed C. O., Nur Syafiqah Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Noor Hisham Jusoh, Shokri The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of organic, inorganic and mixture of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and nutritive value in King Napier grass. The King Napier grass were assigned to seven treatments; Treatment 1, control (no fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 2 (50 N Kg/ha inorganic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 3 (100 N Kg/ha inorganic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 4 (50 N Kg/ha organic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 5 (100 N Kg/ha organic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 6 (mixture of inorganic and organic fertilizer with ratio 50:50 N Kg/ha; n=12) and Treatment 7 (mixture of inorganic and organic fertilizer with ratio 100:100 N Kg/ha; n=9). King Napier that were applied with mixture of organic and inorganic fertilizer (Treatment 7) were the highest than other treatments and showed high content of dry matter (DM;96%) and crude protein (CP;17.7%) and low amount of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF;61.7%), Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF;36.5%) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL;14.8%). Good quality forages with high essential nutrients can be indicated by having higher DM and CP content. Low NDF values are desired as it indicates that the forages has high quality and lower values in ADF and ADL indicates higher quality forages as ADF and ADL level decreased, the digestibility energy level increased. It could be suggested that applying mixture of inorganic and organic fertilizer with ratio 100:100 N Kg/ha could improve the quality and appropriate nutrient composition in Napier grass. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2016 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77584/1/i-SIMBIOMAS%202016%2099.pdf C. O., Nur Syafiqah and Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Noor Hisham and Jusoh, Shokri (2016) Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed. In: Malaysia International Biology Symposium 2016, 26-27 Oct. 2016, PICC, Putrajaya, Malaysia. (p. 99).
institution UPM IR
collection UPM IR
language English
description The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of organic, inorganic and mixture of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and nutritive value in King Napier grass. The King Napier grass were assigned to seven treatments; Treatment 1, control (no fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 2 (50 N Kg/ha inorganic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 3 (100 N Kg/ha inorganic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 4 (50 N Kg/ha organic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 5 (100 N Kg/ha organic fertilizer; n=9), Treatment 6 (mixture of inorganic and organic fertilizer with ratio 50:50 N Kg/ha; n=12) and Treatment 7 (mixture of inorganic and organic fertilizer with ratio 100:100 N Kg/ha; n=9). King Napier that were applied with mixture of organic and inorganic fertilizer (Treatment 7) were the highest than other treatments and showed high content of dry matter (DM;96%) and crude protein (CP;17.7%) and low amount of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF;61.7%), Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF;36.5%) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL;14.8%). Good quality forages with high essential nutrients can be indicated by having higher DM and CP content. Low NDF values are desired as it indicates that the forages has high quality and lower values in ADF and ADL indicates higher quality forages as ADF and ADL level decreased, the digestibility energy level increased. It could be suggested that applying mixture of inorganic and organic fertilizer with ratio 100:100 N Kg/ha could improve the quality and appropriate nutrient composition in Napier grass.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author C. O., Nur Syafiqah
Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Noor Hisham
Jusoh, Shokri
spellingShingle C. O., Nur Syafiqah
Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Noor Hisham
Jusoh, Shokri
Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
author_facet C. O., Nur Syafiqah
Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Noor Hisham
Jusoh, Shokri
author_sort C. O., Nur Syafiqah
title Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
title_short Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
title_full Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
title_fullStr Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
title_full_unstemmed Impact on growth and nutritive value of King Napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
title_sort impact on growth and nutritive value of king napier grass treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers for animal feed
publisher Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia
publishDate 2016
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/77584/1/i-SIMBIOMAS%202016%2099.pdf
_version_ 1819299447876616192
score 13.4562235

Documents similaires